home.gifHome - Vermonters for Better Education
home.gifHome - David Kirkpatrick's pages
toc.gif (195 bytes)Index
small_logo.gif (3715 bytes)

School Choice in India, Finland and Sweden
By David W. Kirkpatrick (November 20, 2009)
Senior Education Fellow
U.S. Freedom Foundation www.freedomfoundation.us

For some years I have corresponded with Larry Willmore, formerly with the United Nations in New York,  currently with the International Institute for Applied Systems in Austria. In July of 2008 he delivered a paper at a conference in Slovenia, recently updated as Basic Education as a Human Right Redux.  He has supplied the following synopsis of that document.

         The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (United Nations, 1948) promises free elementary education and free choice of schools.  This essay reviews arguments against school choice examined in my original 2004 essay.  Next is updated evidence on the poor quality of schooling in India, which permits school choice only for parents who are willing and able to pay for private schooling.  Finally, two countries with very different but very successful educational systems are compared: Sweden, which offers virtually unlimited choice of schooling, and Finland, which allows no choice at all.

         India's educational system, like that of many countries, has evolved into a two-tier system of schooling. Most Indian children are trapped in government schools of low quality. Those who can afford it pay full fees to place their children in private schools, and their numbers are increasing every year.

         There are two ways out of this inequitable and inefficient impasse, and they are at opposite ends of the school choice continuum. One possibility is to move the system closer to that of Finland, by prohibiting all independent schools. The second possibility is to move to a system like that of Sweden, with government paying the same grant per pupil to private and government schools.

         India already has one part of the Finnish system in place: public school teachers enjoy nearly complete freedom and autonomy.  What they lack is the training and professional ethics of Finnish teachers.  The Finnish system is 'trust based' without external exams or monitoring.  This is a system that is difficult to replicate. As Pasi Sahlberg explains in a recent article, "The culture of trust can only flourish in an environment that is built upon good governance and close-to-zero corruption. ... Trusting schools ad teachers [in Finland] is therefore a natural consequence of a generally well-functioning civil society and high social capital. Honesty and trust ... are often seen as among the most basic values and the building blocks of Finnish society.  These demands would seem to rule out consideration of the Finnish model, certainly for India, and perhaps for any country other than present-day Finland.

         The second possibility–the Swedish model–is a viable option and has the added advantage that it respects human rights.   A major problem in India is the total lack of accountability of public school teachers. Expanding school choice to everyone–beyond the circle of parents with sufficient income to pay private fees–the government in effect would be employing millions of parents as performance monitors.  If a school fails to satisfy expectations, at the ed of the school year parents will vote with their feet', and the money government spends on education will follow the child..

         Not all details of the Swedish system are likely to be implemented in India. Schools in Sweden, for example, are prohibited from charging tuition or ‘top-up' fees. Because of wide disparities in income and wealth, India will no doubt find it necessary to allow independent, fee-charging schools to continue operation. But no public money should go to such schools.  Recognized private schools that choose to receive public money should not be allowed to charge top-up fees, nor require entrance examinations.  In exchange, these publicly-financed private schools would receive the same grant per pupil as government schools receive in the same community. It is true that Indian private schools currently operate with much lower expenses than public schools, but there is no reason to discriminate against them in funding.  Greater income will allow them to upgrade facilities and increase staff and salaries If the Swedish experience is any guide, the quality of government schools will increase as well.

 *   *   *

Larry Willmore, "Basic Education as a Human Right Redux", presented to the Second Global International Studies Conference, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia July 2008.  The full paper can be downloaded at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1501925

For more, Google "Larry Willmore, Austria, Education" =  4,000+ hits

# # # # #


Copyright 2009 David W. Kirkpatrick
108 Highland Court,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania 19518-9240
Phone: (610) 689-0633

E-mail (tchrwrtr@aol.com)

To use this material, see the conditions at the top of the home page - DWK